BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//132.216.98.100//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.20.4// BEGIN:VEVENT UID:20250917T205942EDT-2642TkW0Ms@132.216.98.100 DTSTAMP:20250918T005942Z DESCRIPTION:Lin William Cong\n\nCornell University \n\nUnintended Consequen ces of Biodiversity Conservation\n\nDate: Friday\, October 4\, 2024\n Time: 10:30-11:45 am\n Location: Bronfman Bldg. (1001 Sherbrooke St. West)\, Roo m 340\n\nAll are cordially invited to attend.\n\nAbstract:\n\nBiodiversity conservation stands as one of the most urgent and pivotal challenges faci ng humanity today. Yet it often incurs substantial economic or financial c osts and brings fortuitous benefits beyond policymakers and environmentali sts consider. I describe two cases where such conservation efforts have in creased public financing cost or advanced science. In the first case that I briefly summarize\, we investigate how financial markets price the risks biodiversity transition costs induce\, exploiting the 'Green Shield Actio n\,” a major regulatory initiative launched in China in 2017 to enforce bi odiversity preservation rules in national nature reserves. While improving biodiversity\, the initiative led to significant increases in bond yields for municipalities with these reserves. The effects are driven by increas es in local governments' fiscal risk due to expected increases in transiti on costs resulting from shutting down illegal economic activities within r eserves and additional public spending on biodiversity. Investors show lit tle non-financial consideration towards endeavors counteracting biodiversi ty loss.\n\nIn the second case\, which is the main focus of the seminar\, we examine the first strict seasonal fishing ban along the Yangtze River i n 2003 has since successfully preserved fishery resources as originally in tended. Its broader socioeconomic implications\, however\, remain unknown. Exploiting the setting with a difference-in-differences design\, we provi de the earliest causal evidence of how local biodiversity conservation pol icies affect scientific research\, which hinges on having abundant and div erse natural resources as research materials. Specifically\, the ban is es timated to spur an increase\, other things being equal\, in quality resear ch inquiry about Yangtze River fish (funded programs doubling and funding amount more than tripling)\, with scientific outputs manifold greater in b oth quantity (publications more than tripling) and impact (i.e.\, citation s more than quintupling and related books\, patents\, awards\, and media c overage all increasing). We demonstrate that the relative increase in biol ogical research materials drives the result\, rather than other attention- based or policy-based channels. We conclude that preserving nature is not only an ecological duty but also a strategic investment in the future of s cience and innovation.\n DTSTART:20241004T143000Z DTEND:20241004T154500Z LOCATION:Room 340\, Bronfman Building\, CA\, QC\, Montreal\, H3A 1G5\, 1001 rue Sherbrooke Ouest SUMMARY:Desmarais Global Finance Research Centre (DGFRC) Seminar: Lin Willi am Cong URL:/channels/channels/event/desmarais-global-finance- research-centre-dgfrc-seminar-lin-william-cong-360120 END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR